On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:23:11 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
wrote:
>
>Doug Says: Thank you for your confession that you
>deliberately and recklessly attack me "like poking an angry
>dog" for the deliberate and reckless purpose to "wind me
>up." No doubt your criminal cyberstalking is having the
>effect you wish it to impose. The reason we had no dialog
>is becuase I did not respond to your posts cyberstalking me
>and using fraud and false accusations, yet you continued to
>post them at every opportunity.
Stop lying. You are so removed from reality it is simply astonishing.
This isn't opinion. I made no posts regarding you in that period.
None. You instigated this. Stop pretending otherwise.
You are a fool.
> I do not wish to have
>dialogs with criminal cyberstalkers....so consider this my
>last reply and everything else I will do from this point on
>in respect to you will be with law enforcement.
Oh goodie!
>
>
> You have initiated hundreds of cyberstalking type posts
>against me for the obvious deliberate and reckless purpose
>of causing me emotional harm. You have posted and incited
>threats of violence against me, and you have further
>infringed upon my copyrights. You have been warned several
>times by me and my lawyer to cease and desist your
>cyberstalking or face legal action....yet you persist.
>If you disagree with these allegations, then provide where
>you can be served and I will immediately take the approprate
>legal action against you to bring you to justice.
/
"Usenet Kooks, Lawsuits, and You"
"Even though the kook may ask for it, DO NOT post your address, phone
number or other personal information. DO NOT send it via email,
either. Chances are, the nutcase won't use it for what he claims, but
rather, will find some other way to misuse it or harass you. You are
under no obligation to provide your address to anyone but an officer
of the court. If there's the minuscule chance that the nutcase really
does have an attorney, then his attorney will be doing the legwork of
finding your address of record, not the kook."